a murder of crows

take a spin through Karolina Waclawiak's brain matter
DUCHENNE DE BOULOGNE, Guillaume, Mécanisme de la physionomie humaine, Paris, 1862The Believer ran an essay about Charcot, Salpêtrière hospital, and hysteria in the May 2011 issue. It’s a fascinating essay on Victorian treatment of mental illness. The volumes mentioned, Iconographie Photographique de la Salpêtrière, are available online.
Here is an excerpt of the Believer essay:
During the 1870s in Paris, three young women found themselves in the hysteria ward of the Salpêtrière hospital, under the direction of prominent neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot. Over the course of the decade, Blanche, Augustine, and Geneviève became medical celebrities, their images disseminated through a series of volumes called Iconographie Photographique de la Salpêtrière. Every week, eager crowds arrived at the hospital to attend Charcot’s demonstrations, where his most famous hysterics acted out their symptoms for crowds of medical students, physicians, artists, writers, actors, and socialites. The Salpêtrière became a popular place to visit, even a destination for tourists. At the time, hysteria was a fascinating spectacle that invoked science and religion, medicine and the occult, hypnotism and theater, subject and object in ways that blurred the boundaries between research and art.
I first came across the Salpêtrière photographs when I was a graduate student in French at NYU. I was writing my dissertation on a late-nineteenth-century novel, The Future Eve by Villiers de l’Isle-Adam. At that time hysteria was a fashionable topic in literary theory, and was viewed, at least partly, as an illness of being a woman in an era that strictly limited female roles. Blanche, Augustine, and Geneviève, in other words, exhibited symptoms that physically illustrated their actual social conditions, bodily metaphors for their stifling social demands, aptly expressed by paralysis, deafness, and muteness.
Hysteria may be an illness of the past, but the medical and ideological notions of femininity that lie behind it offer insights into the illnesses of the present and the way they are perceived. And while modern medicine no longer talks about hysteria, it nonetheless continues to perpetuate the idea that the female body is far more vulnerable than its male counterpart. Premenstrual syndrome, postpartum depression, and “raging hormones” are among the more recent additions to a medical mythology that is centuries old.
Thus I began with a preconceived notion: that hysterics were victims not only of their home lives but of a misogynist medical institution led by the tyrannical Dr. Charcot. And yet the more I read, the more I found myself admiring Charcot’s brilliance. I also became a reluctant fan of some of the members of his coterie, a group of physicians who worked with him at the Salpêtrière. Instead of a clear-cut world of exploited women and exploiting men, I entered a realm of collaboration between doctor and patient that was far more nuanced.

DUCHENNE DE BOULOGNE, Guillaume, Mécanisme de la physionomie humaine, Paris, 1862

The Believer ran an essay about Charcot, 
Salpêtrière hospital, and hysteria in the May 2011 issue. It’s a fascinating essay on Victorian treatment of mental illness. The volumes mentioned, Iconographie Photographique de la Salpêtrière, are available online.

Here is an excerpt of the Believer essay:

During the 1870s in Paris, three young women found themselves in the hysteria ward of the Salpêtrière hospital, under the direction of prominent neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot. Over the course of the decade, Blanche, Augustine, and Geneviève became medical celebrities, their images disseminated through a series of volumes called Iconographie Photographique de la Salpêtrière. Every week, eager crowds arrived at the hospital to attend Charcot’s demonstrations, where his most famous hysterics acted out their symptoms for crowds of medical students, physicians, artists, writers, actors, and socialites. The Salpêtrière became a popular place to visit, even a destination for tourists. At the time, hysteria was a fascinating spectacle that invoked science and religion, medicine and the occult, hypnotism and theater, subject and object in ways that blurred the boundaries between research and art.

I first came across the Salpêtrière photographs when I was a graduate student in French at NYU. I was writing my dissertation on a late-nineteenth-century novel, The Future Eve by Villiers de l’Isle-Adam. At that time hysteria was a fashionable topic in literary theory, and was viewed, at least partly, as an illness of being a woman in an era that strictly limited female roles. Blanche, Augustine, and Geneviève, in other words, exhibited symptoms that physically illustrated their actual social conditions, bodily metaphors for their stifling social demands, aptly expressed by paralysis, deafness, and muteness.

Hysteria may be an illness of the past, but the medical and ideological notions of femininity that lie behind it offer insights into the illnesses of the present and the way they are perceived. And while modern medicine no longer talks about hysteria, it nonetheless continues to perpetuate the idea that the female body is far more vulnerable than its male counterpart. Premenstrual syndrome, postpartum depression, and “raging hormones” are among the more recent additions to a medical mythology that is centuries old.

Thus I began with a preconceived notion: that hysterics were victims not only of their home lives but of a misogynist medical institution led by the tyrannical Dr. Charcot. And yet the more I read, the more I found myself admiring Charcot’s brilliance. I also became a reluctant fan of some of the members of his coterie, a group of physicians who worked with him at the Salpêtrière. Instead of a clear-cut world of exploited women and exploiting men, I entered a realm of collaboration between doctor and patient that was far more nuanced.

  1. mad-menagerie reblogged this from ladiesofhysteria
  2. ladiesofhysteria reblogged this from deadhorsebrooklyn and added:
    DUCHENNE DE BOULOGNE, Guillaume,Mécanisme de la physionomie humaine, Paris, 1862 The Believer ran an essay about...
  3. filledemarius reblogged this from marypsue
  4. marypsue reblogged this from ophelias-asylum
  5. storiesblackandwhite reblogged this from adrowningwoman
  6. clementinejoyce reblogged this from ophelias-asylum
  7. ophelias-asylum reblogged this from mad-menagerie
  8. peculiarsusceptibility reblogged this from adrowningwoman
  9. adrowningwoman reblogged this from zemonstashaus and added:
    Thanks so much for the links to the books!
  10. zemonstashaus reblogged this from adrowningwoman and added:
    scientific oppression and the medical gaze. I recently found some books on “hysteria” that look interesting: The...
  11. lauracampbelljoyner reblogged this from peculiarsusceptibility
  12. clematispassiflora reblogged this from littlepennydreadful
  13. stealingintolanguage reblogged this from peculiarsusceptibility
  14. baedekersandbeasties reblogged this from littlepennydreadful
  15. littlepennydreadful reblogged this from deadhorsebrooklyn
  16. deadhorsebrooklyn posted this
Tweet